 |
| CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
| Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
| An Evaluation of Multiple Query Representations for the Relevance Judgments used to Build a Biomedical Test Collection |
| Borim Ryu, Jinwook Choi |
|
Healthc Inform Res. 2012;18(1):65-73. Published online March 31, 2012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2012.18.1.65 |
|
An Evaluation of Multiple Query Representations for the Relevance Judgments used to Build a Biomedical Test Collection Healthcare Informatics Research. 2012;18(1):65  Using Multiple Query Aspects to Build Test Collections without Human Relevance Judgments Advances in Information Retrieval. 2009;276-287 Query Performance Prediction and Effectiveness Evaluation Without Relevance Judgments The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 2018; Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations Information Processing & Management. 1991;27(6):629-646 Linking gestural representations to syllable count judgments: A cross-language test Laboratory Phonology. 2022;13(1): Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010;n/a-n/a EVALUATION OF TASK AND JOB SKILL LINKAGE JUDGMENTS USED TO DEVELOP TEST SPECIFICATIONS Personnel Psychology. 1989;42(2):283-292 Effects of Inconsistent Relevance Judgments on Information Retrieval Test Results The Notion of Relevance in Information Science. 2017;81-87 Relevance Judgments for Image Retrieval Evaluation The Information Retrieval Series. 2010;63-80 Variations in relevance judgments and the evaluation of retrieval performance Information Processing & Management. 1992;28(5):619-627 |
