1. Prince MJ, Felder RM. Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J Eng Educ 2006;95(2):123-138.
2. Moule P, Ward R, Lockyer L. Nursing and healthcare students' experiences and use of e-learning in higher education. J Adv Nurs 2010;66(12):2785-2795. PMID:
20946565.
3. Du S, Liu Z, Liu S, Yin H, Xu G, Zhang H, et al. Web-based distance learning for nurse education: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2013;60(2):167-177. PMID:
23691999.
4. Lu DF, Lin ZC, Li YJ. Effects of a Web-based course on nursing skills and knowledge learning. J Nurs Educ 2009;48(2):70-77. PMID:
19260398.
5. Thorne SL, Payne JS. Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO J 2005;22(3):371-397.
6. An JY, Hayman LL, Panniers T, Carty B. Theory development in nursing and healthcare informatics: a model explaining and predicting information and communication technology acceptance by healthcare consumers. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2007;30(3):E37-E49. PMID:
17703115.
7. Delisle C, Sandin S, Forsum E, Henriksson H, Trolle-Lagerros Y, Larsson C, et al. A web- and mobile phone-based intervention to prevent obesity in 4-year-olds (MINISTOP): a population-based randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2015;15:95PMID:
25886009.
8. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas 1992;52(4):1003-1017.
9. Guglielmino LM. Reliability and validity of the selfdirected learning readiness scale and the learning preference assessment. In: Long HB, editors. Expanding horizons in self-directed learning. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma; 1997. p. 209-222.
10. Lim SY, Lee WI. Factor analysis & SDLRS assessment in science and engineering fields' students: in case of KUT's students. J Korean Inst Pract Eng Educ 2010;2(1):17-27.
11. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Mark Sci 2000;19(1):22-42.
12. Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The concept of flow. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, editors. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 239-263.
13. Sherry AC, Fulford CP, Zhang S. Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction: a quantitative and a qualitative measure. Am J Distance Educ 1998;12(3):4-28.
14. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users INFORMS Marketing Science and the Internet Mini-Conference; 1998 Mar. Boston, MA.
15. Jackson SA, Marsh HW. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the Flow State Scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1996;18(1):17-35.
16. Dede C. Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 2009;323(5910):66-69. PMID:
19119219.
17. Parhizkar B, Gebril ZM, Obeidy WK, Ngan MN, Chowdhury SA, Lashkari AH. Android mobile augmented reality application based on different learning theories for primary school children Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems; 2012 May 10-12. Tangier, Morocco; p. 404-408.
18. Larsen YC, Buchholz H, Brosda C, Bogner FX. Evaluation of a portable and interactive augmented reality learning system by teachers and students Augmented reality in education: proceedings of the "Science Center To Go" workshop; 2011 Oct 27-29. Athens, Greece; p. 41-50.
19. Patten B, Sanchez IA, Tangney B. Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Comput Educ 2006;46(3):294-308.
20. Barak M, Rafaeli S. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2004;61(1):84-103.
21. Junco R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Comput Educ 2012;58(1):162-171.
22. Kenny J. Managing innovation in educational institutions. Australas J Educ Technol 2002;18(3):359-376.
23. Nilsson KE, Stomberg MI. Nursing students motivation toward their studies: a survey study. BMC Nurs 2008;7:6PMID:
18439276.
24. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye AR, editors. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 117-136.
25. VandeWalle D. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Hum Resour Manag Rev 2004;13(4):581-604.
26. Hillman DC, Willis DJ, Gunawardena CN. Learner-interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. Am J Distance Educ 1994;8(2):30-42.
27. Atack L, Rankin J. A descriptive study of registered nurses' experiences with web-based learning. J Adv Nurs 2002;40(4):457-465. PMID:
12421405.
28. Kenny A. Online learning: enhancing nurse education? J Adv Nurs 2002;38(2):127-135. PMID:
11940125.
29. Faux TL, Black-Hughes C. A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Res Soc Work Pract 2000;10(4):454-466.
30. Daley BJ, Watkins K, Williams SW, Courtenay B, Davis M, Dymock D. Exploring learning in a technology-enhanced environment. Educ Technol Soc 2001;4(3):126-138.